Legal Opinion

State v. Shamp

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 5, 1988No. C0-87-1494PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Defendant, William R. Shamp, was convicted of a charge of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subd. l(h)(v) (1986) (sexual penetration of complainant under 16 years old by one having a significant relationship to complainant where the sexual abuse of the complainant involved “multiple acts committed over an extended period of time”), and was sentenced to a 54-month prison term. The court of appeals awarded defendant a new trial because the trial court failed to caution the jury that it could not base the conviction on acts of abuse…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. WickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Doe v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. ShoopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. GliddenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API