Sale v. State Highway & Public Works Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The RespoNdeNt’s Appeal.
Paekee, J.
At the close of the petitioners’ evidence — the respondent offered none — the respondent demurred to the jurisdiction of the court. The demurrer was denied. This is respondent’s exception No. 90, and forms the basis of its assignment of error No. 29. The respondent then moved for judgment of nonsuit. This motion was denied, and is respondent’s exception No. 92, forming its assignment of error No. 31.
The respondent had authority by virtue of G.S. 136-19 to acquire the right of way by purchase, as it did.
The purchase of this right of way vested in the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Whichard v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Simms v. . SampsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953