Legal Opinion

Sale v. State Highway & Public Works Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1953No. 95PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

78 S.E.2d 724 (1953)

238 N.C. 599

SALE et al.

v.

STATE HIGHWAY & PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION.

No. 95.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 25, 1953.

Uzzell & DuMont, Asheville, for petitioner-appellants.

R. Brookes Peters, Gen. Counsel, State Highway & Public Works Commission, Raleigh, Gudger, Elmore & Martin, Associate Counsel, Asheville, for respondent-appellant.

PARKER, Justice.

The Respondent's Appeal.

At the close of the petitioners' evidence —the respondent offered none—the respondent demurred to the jurisdiction of the court. The demurrer was denied. This is respondent's exception No. 90, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Whichard v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Simms v. . SampsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sale v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Osborne v. GilreathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Young v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Southern Box and Lumber Co. v. Home Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Wilkes Poultry Co. v. Clark Trailer & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API