Legal Opinion

Simms v. . Sampson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1942PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

If the judgment entered in this proceedings at the December Civil Term, 1940, of the Superior Court of Robeson County, is irregular, the motion to set it aside should have been allowed,

The appellees contend that the appellants are relying solely for relief upon the authority to set aside a judgment under the provisions of C. S., section 600; and that an application for relief thereunder is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge. Bank v. Foote, 77 N. C., 131; Norton v. McLaurin, 125 N. C., 185, 34 S. E., 269; Dunn v. Jones, 195 N. C., 354, 142 S. E., 320. It is further contended…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carter v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. McKee v. . AngelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Harris v. . BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Jones v. . MialSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Garrett v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Mills v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API