Legal Opinion
Cacace v. Lucas
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 19, 1990No. Civ. N-87-430 (EEB)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ELLEN B. BURNS, Chief Judge.
On March 6, 1989, this court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant had violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq. (“FDCPA”). The court held that the plaintiffs had not established that the defendant was a “debt collector” under the FDCPA. However, the motion was denied without prejudice to the plaintiffs to file a renewed motion on a fuller record. Pursuant to that ruling, the plaintiffs filed the instant motion. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ken Baker v. G. C. Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Vadonna M. Pipiles v. Credit Bureau of Lockport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Mary Crossley v. Arnold R. LiebermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Michael G. Schroyer Gail R. Schroyer v. Kenneth P. Frankel Gerald M. Smith Company, L.P.A., D/B/A Smith & SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Sarah Goldstein v. Hutton, Ingram, Yuzek, Gainen, Carroll & BertolottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Kuhn v. Account Control Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1994
- Teng v. Metropolitan Retail Recovery Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Irwin v. MascottDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.