Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Cleveland

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1944No. 4852PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

The relator, being qualified to hold the office of Congressman, presented his declaration of candidacy for the nomination for such office as the candidate of the Republican Party at the ensuing general election.

The respondent refused to accept this declaration for filing on the ground that relator was barred by the provisions of 1941 Comp. Sec. 56-809, as amended by Laws 1943, c. 86, § 3, because he had changed his party affiliation within twelve months prior to the issuance of the proclamation by the Governor calling the forthcoming primary election.

It is not disputed that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Socialist Party v. Uhl.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People Ex Rel. Lindstrand v. EmmersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Swindall v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Lett v. DennisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Canaan v. AbdelnourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Stevenson v. GilfertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. Turner v. BarnhartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Cavender v. Board of Supervisors of Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API