Legal Opinion

Cavender v. Board of Supervisors of Pima County

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1958No. 6749PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*158UDALL, Chief Justice.

Within ten days after the primary election held on September 9, 1958, appellants Cecil Cavender and Richard J. Dowdall, qualified electors of Pima County, sought to have their names placed on the ballot for the general election to be held on November 4, 1958, the former as a candidate for County Supervisor (District No. 2), and the latter as a candidate for State Representative (Legislative District No. 9). The Board of Supervisors of Pima County, appellees herein, refused to accept the certificates of nomination filed in behalf of appellants pursuant to the provisions of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Broughton v. Pursifull, ClerkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. George v. Board of Ballot CommissionersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Roberts v. ClevelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Napier v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Brooks v. KerbyArizona Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White v. BatemanArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Clifton v. DecillisArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Arizonans for Second Chances v. HobbsArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Board of Supervisors of Pima County v. HarringtonArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Board of Supervisors of Pima County v. HarringtonArizona Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API