Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Monett

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 1, 1966No. 19,128PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

Under Articles 67 (b) (2) and 69, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 867 and 869, respectively, The Judge Advocate General of the Army forwarded the record of trial to this *180Court for consideration of the following issue:

Was the board of review correct in finding the approved sentence incorrect in law and setting it aside?

Appellate defense counsel moved to dismiss the certificate for review, on the ground that, as applied to this case, the Article 69 provision, which confers the right upon The Judge Advocate General to forward a record of trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cochran v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. HamillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. ProwUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. United States v. ZimmermanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. Lopez de VictoriaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. DukesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. BriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. ReddingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API