Legal Opinion

United States v. Hamill

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 13, 1957No. 9836PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GEORGE W. LatimeR, Judge:

Upon his arraignment before a general court-martial, the accused pleaded guilty to the crime of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921. Before accepting the plea, the law officer held an out-of-court conference to make sure that the plea was being entered voluntarily and intelligently. To that end he asked the accused to state in his own words why he was pleading guilty. The accused replied generally that he had committed the crime; that his own pretrial confession would serve to convict him; and that…

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. WindhamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  2. United States v. LanzerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. WinbornUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  4. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  5. United States v. MonettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API