Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Superior Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1983No. 16605-SAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

Petitioner (the City) brings this special action proceeding alleging that the respondent trial judge acted in excess of his authority and jurisdiction or abused his discretion in a condemnation action by denying the City’s application for immediate possession of land owned or possessed by the real parties in interest (property owners). Finding that the petition presented important questions of general public interest and that there is no remedy by appeal, we accepted jurisdiction. We have such jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5, and Ariz.R.Sp.Act. 4, 17A A.R.S.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Miller v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Yonkers Community Development Agency v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. In Re ForsstromArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Parking Systems, Inc. v. Kansas City Downtown Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Surprise v. acc/lake PleasantArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Bailey v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. W. & G. Co. v. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. City of Sedona v. DevolCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. City of Birmingham v. Tutwiler Drug Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API