Legal Opinion
Laufman v. Oakley Building & Loan Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 8, 1976No. C-1-74-153PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAVID S. PORTER, District Judge.
This is a civil rights action which was instituted on April 29, 1974, in. which the plaintiffs, a white married couple, are suing the Oakley Building and Loan Company and its officers, pursuant to Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d, and regulations issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 12 C.F.R. 528 and 531. We held that the complaint stated valid claims for relief under the above provisions, and denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Claxton L. Burns, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Thiokol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lora v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- Rosenfeld v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Sewell v. Public Service Co. of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Dunn v. Midwestern IndemnityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.