Legal Opinion

cheatham/huey v. Diciccio/phoenix Law Enforcement Association

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2016No. CV-15-0287-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHIEF JUSTICE BALES,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 The Gift Clause of Arizona’s Constitution bars cities and other public entities from “mak[ing] any donation or grant, by subsidy or otherwise, to any individual, association, or corporation.” Ariz. Const, art. 9, § 7. For decades, the City of Phoenix has contracted in collective bargaining agreements with police officers to allow “release time,” that is, to pay officers for certain time spent on behalf of their authorized representative (a police union) rather than regular police duties. We hold that the release time provisions at issue here do not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Valley Medical Specialists v. FarberArizona Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Darcie Schires v. Cathy CarlatArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Ansley v. Banner HealthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. Mark Gilmore v. Kate GallegoArizona Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Ansley v. Banner HealthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. GOLDWATER v. PHOENIXArizona Supreme Court · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API