Legal Opinion

Roane v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 29, 2001No. 00-5015PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.

The Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED, for the limited purpose of revising the Opinion to read:

The United States appeals the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims, which held that the method used by the United States Air Force (“Air Force”) in awarding promotions was invalid because it was inconsistent with various statutes and a Department of Defense (“DoD”) Directive. See Roane v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 168 (1996). The Court of Federal Claims awarded reinstatement with back pay to Major John Roane, on the grounds that the Air Force Promotion Review…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ron L. Fluellen,plaintiff-Appellant v. United States,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Walter D. Small v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. Roane v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Campa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Campa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Chisolm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. Bateson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API