Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

King v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 1, 2001No. 96-439CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Senior Judge.

Plaintiff seeks to recover military pay, allowances, and other benefits, as well as correction of his military record to delete any and all references to his promotion non-selections and 1992 retirement, and to reflect continuous active duty service, and thereby permit his reinstatement to active duty. The matter was suspended in 1996 pending final resolution of two related cases: Small v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 43 (1996), and Roane v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 168 (1996). The suspension ended with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. John F. Kreis v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  4. James L. Murphy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Noyd v. McNamaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Antonellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Greene v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Mercer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Antonellis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Bateson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API