Legal Opinion
Campa v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 29, 2001No. 96-279CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Senior Judge.
This military pay ease concerns several former United States Air Force officers that were involuntarily separated from active duty after they were considered but not selected for promotion. The matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss and plaintiffs’ opposition thereto. Plaintiffs contend that the Air Force promotion process violates several applicable statutes and regulations and that therefore their involuntary separation was invalid. Defendant argues that plaintiffs’ claims must fail under authority that is binding on this Court. For the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Janice R. Lachance, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. John E. White, and Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Ron L. Fluellen,plaintiff-Appellant v. United States,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Walter D. Small v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Campa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Bateson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Campa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002