Legal Opinion
State v. Arndt
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1976No. 43612PublishedCited by 222 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
This case arises from a grand larceny conviction for fraudulent receipt of public assistance. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. State v. Arndt, 12 Wn. App. 248, 529 P.2d 887 (1974). We affirm.
The defendant, having received public assistance for approximately 2% years, was charged with violating RCW 74.08.331. A copy of the amended information is set out in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. RCW 74.08.331 provides in part:
Any person who by means of a wilfully false statement, or representation, or impersonation, or a wilful failure to reveal any material fact, condition or…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. AaronMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.