Legal Opinion
United States v. Earnesty
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided June 3, 1992No. ACM S28465PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MILLS, Judge:
On 6 and 7 December 1990, Airman Basic Earnesty was tried by a special court-martial composed of officer members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of one specification of wrongful appropriation of a government vehicle, in violation of Article 121, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 921. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of one specification of drunk driving and one specification of negligent damage to a government vehicle in the amount of about $5,000.00, in violation of Articles 111 and 108, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 911, 908. The approved sentence provides for a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wainwright v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. RileyNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995