Legal Opinion

Wainwright v. Greenfield

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 14, 1986No. 84-1480PublishedCited by 654 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

Respondent entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity to a charge of sexual battery. At his trial in the Circuit Court for Sarasota County, Florida, the prosecutor argued that respondent’s silence after receiving Miranda warnings was evidence of his sanity. The question presented is whether such use of a defendant’s silence violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as construed in Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U. S. 610 (1976).

*286HH

The battery occurred in woods near a beach in the vicinity of Sarasota, Florida. After respondent released his victim, she drove directly to the police…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by654 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

649 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API