Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Harrington

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 2010No. AP-76,288PublishedCited by 295 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.

The issue in this case is whether post-conviction habeas-corpus relief is available under Article 11.07 1 if an applicant has discharged his sentence, but continues to suffer collateral consequences arising from the conviction. We hold that it is.

In this case, applicant contends that ha-beas corpus lies because his plea was involuntary due to counsel’s ineffectiveness in failing to investigate a prior DWI conviction used to enhance applicant’s misdemeanor DWI charge to a felony charge. 2 He claims that he is confined as a result of his conviction and is thus entitled to habe-as relief.…

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  5. Ex Parte MorrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by295 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MoussazadehCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Ex Parte NiswangerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Ex Parte Martin Fassi, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  4. Ex Parte Silvio Bosco LUNA, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  5. Ex Parte Luciano Resendez Arjona, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013

290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API