Legal Opinion

Hazle Drug Co. v. Wilner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1925No. Appeal, 166PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

In September, 1920, the plaintiff corporation sold and delivered to the defendants, in Pennsylvania, a thousand cases (twelve thousand bottles), being a car lot of horke vino, for $9,400, and this action of assumpsit is on a trade acceptance given therefor. The defense interposed was that horke vina was an intoxicating liquor sold by plaintiff in violation of law. The jury, on an implied finding that it was not sold as a beverage, rendered a verdict for plaintiff; the trial court, however, entered judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto ; therefrom…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Vigliotti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Johnson v. HulingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  4. Fowler v. Scully ex rel. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  5. Commonwealth v. AldermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. F. F. Bollinger Co. v. Widmann Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Rosenthal v. OstrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Howarth Et Ux. v. GilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Bair v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Stillman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API