Legal Opinion

Bair v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1939No. Appeal, 54PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer,

This is an action of assumpsit. Defendant filed an affidavit of defense raising questions of law. The court entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The statement of claim set forth that plaintiff was employed as a laborer for defendant in its colliery and on August 11, 1926, was accidently injured, and therefore entitled to compensation; a hearing was held before • the compensation referee and, at the hearing, defendant was represented by an attorney; after the hearing, plaintiff advised the attorney that he thought he should be paid $3,000, demanded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woolsey v. Panhandle Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Seiss v. McClintic-marshall Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Ashland Lumber Co. v. Detroit Salt Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Welsch v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Hazle Drug Co. v. WilnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. American Casualty Co. v. KLIGERMANSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Leaseway Systems, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Wahs v. Wolf (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Green v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API