Legal Opinion
F. F. Bollinger Co. v. Widmann Brewing Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 26, 1940No. Appeal, 166PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Baenes,
The sole question upon this appeal is whether the violation by the plaintiff corporation of the Acts of Assembly relating to the practice of architecture and of engineering should deprive it of compensation for architectural and engineering services rendered to the defendant.
The F. F. Bollinger Company was incorporated under the laws of this State and specializes in the designing, construction and rehabilitation of breweries. Its president, F. F. Bollinger, has been engaged in that business for many years. On June 1, 1933, the defendant accepted the proposal of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Verona v. Schenley Farms Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Johnson v. HulingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Lamb v. CondonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Swing v. MunsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Holt v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Greenspan v. Third Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Howarth Et Ux. v. GilmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Rasa Engineering Corp. v. DaubónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Howarth Et Ux. v. GilmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- American Universal Ins. Co. v. SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.