Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Scully ex rel. First National Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1873No. 171PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Error to the District Court of Allegheny county: No. 171, to October and November Term 1871. On the 81st of May 1871, John D. Scully, in trust for The First National Bank of the city of Pittsburg, issued a scire facias sur mortgage against Silas S. Fowler with notice to William Vankirk, terre-tenant. The mortgage, dated October 21st 1869, was between Silas S. Fowler and John Scully, in trust for The First National Bank of the city of Pittsburg.

Read the full summary

Error to the District Court of Allegheny county: No. 171, to October and November Term 1871. On the 81st of May 1871, John D. Scully, in trust for The First National Bank of the city of Pittsburg, issued a scire facias sur mortgage against Silas S. Fowler with notice to William Vankirk, terre-tenant. The mortgage, dated October 21st 1869, was between Silas S. Fowler and John Scully, in trust for The First National Bank of the city of Pittsburg. It recited: “Whereas, the said bank hath agreed to discount for said Fowler an amount in the aggregate not exceeding $100,000, such negotiable…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered, by

Agnew, J.

— The First National Bank of Pittsburg asked the District Court to enforce by scire facias the payment of a mortgage for future advances. The defendant, the owner of the mortgaged *461land, asserts that the mortgage is forbidden by the Act of Congress, which confers upon the bank its charter and all its powers. The simple question is, Is the mortgage valid or void; and if void will the law enforce it ? In deciding this question, we must be guided by the Federal laws and Federal precedents, for the subject is one of. Federal origin and Federal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. Head & Amory v. Providence Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1804
  4. Clippinger v. HepbaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  5. Columbia Bank & Bridge Co. v. HaldemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZeiglerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. County of Divide v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Feld & Sons, Inc. v. Pechner, Dorfman, Wolfee, Rounick, & CabotSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Contractor Industries v. ZerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Crocker v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API