Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Eureka Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1911PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from Joseph S. Adams, J., at December Term, 1910, of Beaueobt. Civil action of trespass, involving an issue as to- title. On said issue as to title there was verdict for defendant, judgment, and plaintiff excepted and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

On the trial it appeared that both parties claimed under Ruel Windley, deceased, who by bis last will and testament, bearing date in 1854, made disposition of certain real estate as follows: “I give and devise to my two grandsons, G-eoitge 0. Respess and John B. Respess, all of my river shore lands, lying on the north side of Pamlico River and known as the William W^dley, deceased, lands, excepting 100 acres which I shall lend to Ruel W. Jordan and given to his children, and also except 100 acres wbicb I shall give to my friend, James Windley, and the rest-of the said tract to be equally…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strother v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Outlaw v. . Hurdle and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  3. Tunstall v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Martin v. . KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Fuller v. . FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. . StephensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. State v. LeDucSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Fourth National Bank v. McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. In Re Will of BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API