Legal Opinion

Orval Care v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 14, 1956No. 5239_1PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOTT, District Judge.

Appellant, 1 following an extended hearing on his motion to suppress evidence alleged to have been obtained by means of an illegal search and seizure, after denial of the motion, waived trial by jury upon the charges contained in a six-count indictment 2 and submitted the issues to the court upon the evidence adduced at the hearing on the motion. He was found guilty on each count, placed on probation for five years and appealed.

The denial of the motion to suppress is crucial; for without the evidence secured in the search, the conviction cannot stand. The trial court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Clyde Albert Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  5. Roberson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. W. H. Wattenburg and William P. Owens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. William C. Drummond v. United States of America, Alphonse Vincent Castaldi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API