Legal Opinion

W. H. Wattenburg and William P. Owens v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 19, 1968No. 21301-_1PublishedCited by 126 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:

W. H. Wattenburg and William P. Owens were jointly charged, tried before a jury, and convicted, of stealing and conspiring to steal approximately one thousand red fir trees, Christmas-tree size, belonging to the United States. On their appeals, consolidated for disposition here, they argue that neither count of the indictment states an offense, the trial court erred in denying their motions to suppress certain evidence, admissible evidence was prejudicially excluded, the evidence does not support the convictions, and the court erred in instructing the jury.

We first…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by126 opinions

  1. People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. United States v. Vincent Martino, John Torrioni, Policardo Despaigne, A/K/A "Paulie," Odell Miller, A/K/A "Pluggy," John Radice, and John PerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. State v. BullockMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. United States v. Francisco Bustamante-Gamez, United States of America v. Abelardo Garcia-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API