Legal Opinion
DeGidio v. Pung
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1989No. Civ. No. 4-84-352PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
This matter was tried to the court over thirty-one days. Dozens of witnesses were called and thousands of documents were received. After the close of the evidence each side submitted trial briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. Thereafter the court carefully considered all the evidence and submissions and issued its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order for Judgment. DeGidio v. Pung, 704 F.Supp. 922 (D.Minn. 1989). The parties now bring several post-trial motions. Plaintiffs move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(b) to amend their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Evans, Inc. v. Tiffany & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- DeGidio v. PungDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Hines v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1977
- William B. Cross v. M. R. PasleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Davis v. MathewsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ellenberg v. Board of Regents (In Re Midland Mechanical Contractors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
- In Re DEF Investments, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- In Re TarrerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- Matter of McDanielUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1998
- In Re St. Marie Development Corporation of Montana, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.