Legal Opinion
DeGidio v. Pung
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 19, 1989No. Civ. 4-84-352PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Anthony DeGidio, James Murray, and Antti John Haavisto brought this class action on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated plaintiffs. On June 13, 1985 the court certified a class for purposes of injunctive relief. The class is comprised of “persons who are, or have been, incarcerated at the Minnesota State Prison at Stillwater, Minnesota who contract, or had, tuberculosis or develop positive reactions demonstrating exposure to tuberculosis while being held there.” DeGidio v.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Forbes v. EdgarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Forbes v. EdgarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- DeGidio v. PungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Marchello McCaster v. Mary ClausenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Johnson v. BoreaniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.