United States v. Harness
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KEATING, Senior Judge:
We decide in this case whether the presence at trial of a non-lawyer holding himself out as counsel qualified in accordance with Article 27(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 827(b), deprived the accused of effective assistance of counsel when the accused was also represented by a civilian lawyer. We hold that representation at trial by a civilian lawyer and an appointed military counsel, who is a graduate of an accredited law school but who is not admitted to the practice of law (compare Article 27(b), UCMJ, with Secretary of the Navy Instruetion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Harriet Rimell, United States of America v. Albert RimellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. JacksonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000