Legal Opinion

United States v. Harness

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 26, 1996No. NMCM 93 00224PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KEATING, Senior Judge:

We decide in this case whether the presence at trial of a non-lawyer holding himself out as counsel qualified in accordance with Article 27(b), Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ], 10 U.S.C. § 827(b), deprived the accused of effective assistance of counsel when the accused was also represented by a civilian lawyer. We hold that representation at trial by a civilian lawyer and an appointed military counsel, who is a graduate of an accredited law school but who is not admitted to the practice of law (compare Article 27(b), UCMJ, with Secretary of the Navy Instruetion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Harriet Rimell, United States of America v. Albert RimellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. JacksonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API