People v. Sandee
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtIrion, J.
*297After the trial court denied a motion to suppress evidence, Megan Donna Sandee pled guilty to possession for sale of a controlled substance ( Health & Saf. Code, § 11378 ) and unauthorized possession of a controlled substance (id ., § 11377, subd. (a)). The trial court granted felony probation to the court for a period of three years.
Sandee challenges the trial court's denial of her motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the search of her cell phone.1 According to Sandee, *298although she was on probation at the time of the search and subject to a general search condition which allowed…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. Guzman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Pride, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- State v. LietzauCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- People v. BurgosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024
- People v. LyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.