Legal Opinion

State v. Lietzau

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 25, 2019No. 2 CA-CR 2018-0011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESPINOSA, Judge:

¶1 The state appeals the trial court's suppression of evidence taken from Bryan Lietzau's cell phone, arguing the court erred in denying its request to present testimony from Lietzau's probation officer at the suppression hearing and in granting Lietzau's motion to suppress. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

*841Factual and Procedural Background

¶2 "We discuss only those facts relevant to the suppression ruling challenged on appeal," State v. Navarro , 241 Ariz. 19, ¶ 2, 382 P.3d 1234 (App. 2016), viewing them "in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Bryan Mitchell LietzauArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Armstrong v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API