State v. Lietzau
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ESPINOSA, Judge:
¶1 The state appeals the trial court's suppression of evidence taken from Bryan Lietzau's cell phone, arguing the court erred in denying its request to present testimony from Lietzau's probation officer at the suppression hearing and in granting Lietzau's motion to suppress. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.
*841Factual and Procedural Background
¶2 "We discuss only those facts relevant to the suppression ruling challenged on appeal," State v. Navarro , 241 Ariz. 19, ¶ 2, 382 P.3d 1234 (App. 2016), viewing them "in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Bryan Mitchell LietzauArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Armstrong v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024