United States v. H. Rosenthal Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MarKey, Chief Judge.
The Government, appeals from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court, 81 Cust. Ct. 77, C.D. 4769 (1978), sustaining H. Rosenthal Co.’s (Rosenthal’s) classification protest relating to imported men’s and boy’s parkas. Judge Morgan Ford held that proper classification was under item 376.56,2 TSUS, as “coated rainwear.” We affirm.
*9Background
The parkas, imported from South Korea in August 1973, were made from nylon fabric coated with a waterproofing acrylic polymer. Invisible to the unaided eye, the coating is visible under a microscope at 35x magnification.
The Customs Service…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- United States v. Corning Glass WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- Akawo v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- H. Rosenthal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Kaplan Products & Textiles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- United States v. RojasDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Foxfire, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.