Legal Opinion

Durante v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1937No. Civ. 10215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The defendant appeals from a judgment awarded plaintiffs for damage to personal property. Defendant concedes that the complaint stated a cause of action under the Public Liability Act of 1923. (Stats. 1923, p. 675.) It alleged that defendant used broken and defective sewer pipes in a public sewer system under the surface of Washington Street in Oakland, and knowingly maintained the same in a dangerous and defective condition, with the result that plaintiffs’ basement at 811 Washington Street was flooded and their merchandise damaged. It was further alleged that a claim for the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Smith v. Occidental & Oriental Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Skaggs v. WileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. City of Atchison v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Stang v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Sebern v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Stang v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API