Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Shrader & York
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 5, 1991No. Civ. A. H-91-1372PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORMAN W. BLACK, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, or, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim for which the Court can Grant Relief.
On May 17, 1991, the FDIC brought a legal malpractice lawsuit against Shrader & York. The FDIC’s claims are based on the law firm’s alleged negligence in failing to advise two savings and loan associations, City Savings and Loan Association (“City”) and Lamar Savings Association (“Lamar”), to obtain regulatory approval for certain business transactions. Defendants make four arguments in support of their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- In the Matter of James Yao Gleasman and Margaret Yao Gleasman, Debtors. James Yao Gleasman and Margaret Yao Gleasman v. Jones, Day, Reavis & PogueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Miller v. DoughtyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
3Cited by9 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc. v. Shrader & York, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GardnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. KerrDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1992
- Askanase v. FatjoDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. NathanDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.