Legal Opinion

Schnupp v. Blair Pharmacy, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 9, 2022No. 1:17-cv-02335Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES ex rel. TIMOTHY SCHNUPP Relator Civil Action No. ELH-17-2335 v. BLAIR PHARMACY, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this qui tam action, Timothy Schnupp, the Relator, has sued his former employer, Blair Pharmacy, Inc. (“Blair Pharmacy” or “Pharmacy”), and its director and principal, Matthew Blair, pursuant to the False Claims Act (“FCA”),

31 U.S.C. §§ 3728

et seq. See ECF 30 (First Amended Complaint). The suit contains two counts. Count I asserts false claims under 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(A) and Count II…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API