Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pasadena Metro Blue Line Construction Authorithy v. Pacific Bell Telephone Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 2006No. B181175PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J.

Plaintiff Pasadena Metro Blue Line Construction Authority (the Authority) appeals from the summary judgment entered for defendants Southern California Edison Co. (Edison), Southern California Gas Co. (SCG), and Pacific Bell Telephone Co. (PacBell), which determined that those companies did not have to reimburse the Authority for the cost of relocating their utility lines as part of the Authority’s construction of a light rail public transit line. We affirm.

ISSUE PRESENTED

The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) operates a light rail public transit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Barber v. Marina Sailing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Pang v. Beverly Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Illinois v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. City of Livermore v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. TingcungcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Kalnel Gardens, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Crespo v. WFS Financial Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  4. Madrigal v. California Victim Compensation & Government Claims BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Travis v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API