Legal Opinion

Simonian v. Allergan, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 30, 2010No. 10 C 02414PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

AMY J. ST. EVE, District Judge:

Relator, Thomas A. Simonian, has brought a qui tarn action against Defendant, Allergan, Inc., alleging that Allergan has violated 35 U.S.C. § 292 by marking certain of its prescription pharmaceutical products with two expired patents, namely U.S. Patent Numbers 4,839,342 (“the '342 patent”) and 4,649,047 (“the '047 patent”). (R. 1.) Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (R. 19.) On September 2, 2010, the Court granted Allergan’s unopposed notice of voluntary withdrawal of the Rule 12(b)(1)…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dachev v. Rich America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Simonian v. Weber-Stephen Products Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API