Legal Opinion
United States v. Jung Joo Park
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided May 24, 2019No. 16 C 10787PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HON. JORGE L. ALONSO, United States District Judge
Plaintiff, the United States of America, brings this action against surviving family members of Que Te Park to collect a financial penalty assessed against him for failing to report his foreign bank accounts. His children, defendants Charles C. Park, James Park, and Nina Park, have moved *565to dismiss the claims against them. Additionally, James Park has moved to quash service of process on behalf of his mother, Jung Joo Park. For the following reasons, the motions are denied.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are taken from the government's Third…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brooks v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- 1025 W Addison Street Apartments Owner LLC v. Grupo Cinemex, S.A. de C.V.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Blackstone International, Ltd. v. Zhejiang Mikia Lighting Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Calderon v. Procter & Gamble Company, TheDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Forde v. Arburg GMBHDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Krementz v. SiddiquiDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.