Calderon v. Procter & Gamble Company, The
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Lynda Calderon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-3326 v. Judge Mary M. Rowland The Procter & Gamble Company, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Lynda Calderon, brings this putative class action against Defendant, The Procter & Gamble Company, alleging that P&G’s melatonin supplements contain significantly more melatonin than stated on the products’ label. Calderon claims this violates state consumer protection laws. Defendant moves to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Bell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.