Humboldt Savings & Loan Society v. Dowd
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Action to foreclose a mortgage. Plaintiff had judgment. Defendants made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is from the judgment and order. The facts are substantially as follows: On January 8, 1886, Jeremiah O’Connell was the owner of the premises described in the complaint, and on said day he and his wife, Annie, executed and acknowledged a mortgage to the plaintiff bank to secure the payment of a promissory note for $3,500 of even date, due two years thereafter. In course of time, Jeremiah O’Connell died, leaving surviving him his wife, Annie, and five…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Whelan v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Otto v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tiffany & Co. v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Rohrbacher v. AitkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lagomarsino v. GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Estate of ChamberlainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Warren National Bank v. SuerkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.