State v. Scott
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Criminal Court of Davidson County. J. M. Anderson, J.
1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.
J. M. Scott is under presentment for doing a privileged business without license. The Substance of the charge is that he, as agent of the Chicago Portrait Company, a foreign corporation, had solicited and received orders from citizens and residents of Davidson County, Tenn., for -the enlargement of pictures, and forwarded them to his principal, at Chicago, Ill., where the work was to be done; and that he, though not himself a photographer in this State, had done this without first paying a privilege tax and obtaining a license, as required by law.
The Judge of the Criminal Court quashed the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Railroad v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Austin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Corn v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.