Legal Opinion

McNeil v. Powers

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 9, 2004No. 21958-5-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Duncan McNeil, a person identified as a “vexatious litigant” in two bankruptcy courts, filed a frivolous lawsuit against John Powers and the others listed in the case caption. Attorney Robert Caruso initiated the suit on Mr. McNeil’s behalf. Mr. Caruso withdrew as Mr. McNeil’s attorney prior to summary judgment dismissal of *582Mr. McNeil’s complaint. The superior court granted Mr. Powers’ CR 11 motion requiring Mr. Caruso to pay Mr. Powers’ costs and attorney fees incurred while Mr. Caruso represented Mr. McNeil. Mr. Caruso appealed. We affirm the sanctions.

FACTS

Mr. McNeil’s alter ego entities…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Holland v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. BUILDING INDUSTRY ASS'N v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Building Industry Ass'n v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. In Re the Recall of LindquistWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. McNeil v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. In Re the Recall of LindquistWashington Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API