Legal Opinion

In Re the Recall of Lindquist

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2011No. 85361-4Published

1Opinion of the Court

258 P.3d 9 (2011)

172 Wn.2d 120

In the Matter of the Recall of Mark E. LINDQUIST, Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney, Respondent.

No. 85361-4.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Considered April 28, 2011.

Decided July 21, 2011.

G. Perrin Walker, Mark A. Hood, Daniel C. Montopoli, Vandeberg, Johnson & Gandara, Douglas Warren Vanscoy, David H. Prather, Pierce County Prosecutor's Office, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

FAIRHURST, J.

¶ 1 Petitioners Albert O. Ugás and Daniel B. Fishburn filed a recall petition against respondent Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney Mark Lindquist, charging him with (1)…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Biggs v. VailWashington Supreme Court · 1994

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API