Legal Opinion

Lecangdam v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 2002No. 00-00964; A115535PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding SAIF’s denial of compensation for claimant’s hearing loss in his left ear. We affirm.

Claimant has worked as a mechanic for approximately 25 years. During that time, he has been exposed to noise from pneumatic air tools, tire-mounting equipment, and other loud noises in the workplace. In 1998 and 1999, he began having difficulty hearing, particularly in noisy environments.

In September 1999, claimant filed a workers’ compensation claim for hearing loss in both ears and sought medical treatment for those…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mathel v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. WodaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Wantowski v. Crown Cork & SealCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smirnoff v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Brumage v. ESCO CORP.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Fimbres v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API