Legal Opinion

Wantowski v. Crown Cork & Seal

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 24, 1999No. 97-10451, 97-05551, 97-08102, 97-06580; CA A103971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Claimant, a 64-year-old metal worker, seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) holding that his bilateral hearing loss is not compensable. We affirm.

We take the facts from the Board’s unchallenged findings. Since 1964, claimant has worked for employer or its predecessor as a scroll shear operator. A scroll shear is a machine that cuts sheet metal and places the metal into a press to make cans and other metal objects. The work environment is loud.

Beginning in 1969, employer required all employees exposed to noise to wear ear protection. Claimant wore ear protection.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Reynolds MetalsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Brown v. A-Dec, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lecangdam v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Brumage v. ESCO CORP.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API