Legal Opinion

Prim v. Farmers' Nat. Bank of Dublin

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1932No. Motion No. 10212; 1505—5797PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, P. J.

In the above cause the defendant in error, the Farmers’ National Bank of Dublin, recovered in the trial court a judgment against the plaintiff in error, S. H. Prim, on four promissory notes. One of said notes is for the principal sum of $1,891; a second, for $3,700; a third, for $4,154; and a fourth, for $10,000. In the judgment, certain liens were foreclosed as against S. H. Prim, Mrs. Ella Prim, and Mrs. Grace Lyon. In perfecting their appeal from said judgment, these last-named parties gave a supersedeas bond as prescribed by article 2270 of the statutes. The sureties on said bond are T.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Home Investment Co. v. StrangeTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Home Inv. Co. v. StrangeTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Home Inv. Co. v. StrangeTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Prim v. Farmers' Nat. Bank of DublinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Wichita Falls, Ranger & Ft. Worth Railway Co. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harris v. WareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Harris v. KeounCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. McNeill v. BURLINGTON RESOURCE OIL & GASNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Harris v. WareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API