Legal Opinion

Harris v. Keoun

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1939No. 2143PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This is an original proceeding instituted in the lower court to recover on a super-sedeas bond. In August 1934, G. W. Ware recovered a judgment against Mrs. C. W. Harris and others for debt with foreclosure of lien and certain other relief not necessary to here mention. The defendants in that suit appealed by supersedeas bond. On appeal we affirmed the judgment in part and reversed and rendered it in part. Motion by appellees in that suit for summary judgment against the sureties, on the super-sedeas bond was denied by this court on the ground that this court was without…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Employers Casualty Co. v. County of RockwallTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Trent v. RhombergTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Blair v. SanbornTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Employers' Casualty Co. v. Rockwall CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Robinson v. BrinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1857

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Castle Texas Production Ltd. Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2005
  2. Stanley L. Neeley v. Bankers Trust Co. Of Texas, and Fireman's Fund Insurance, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. Amwest Surety Insurance v. Graham, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  4. Railroad Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Harris v. WareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API