Legal Opinion

Home Inv. Co. v. Strange

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1918No. 2516PublishedCited by 22 opinions

On motions for rehearing and to reform and affirm.

1Opinion of the CourtHawkins, J.

Upon consideration of the motion of plaintiffs in error for a rehearing we adhere to the conclusions announced in our former opinion. Accordingly, said motion will be overruled. „

Our former order remanding this cause was based upon the fact that the amounts of purchase money paid out by Moroney or under his directions had not been’ ascertained by the jury. The motion of defendant in error for a rehearing, and to reform and affirm, avers that all such amounts, and dates of payment thereof, are disclosed by the undisputed evidence of Moroney himself, and makes a tabulation of the various items,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. St. Paul's Sanitarium v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Frazier v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Wilkin v. Geo. W. Owens & Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Carl v. SettegastTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Bush v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Ryan v. PlathWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hall v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Hand v. ErringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API