Legal Opinion

Home Investment Co. v. Strange

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1918No. 2516PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Dallas County. The Home Investment Company and others, defendants in the trial court, appealed from a judgment recovered against them by Strange; and on its affirmance they obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was instituted in the District Court of Dallas County by H.B. Strange, by petition in trespass to try title, against the Home Investment Company, a corporation, and W.B. Kendall and his wife, Emma G. Kendall, to recover the title to seven lots situated in Dallas County, Texas, being lots 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of Huffman subdivision of lots 1 and 4 of block A, Bowser Lemon's addition to the City of Dallas. The original petition was filed February 9, 1907. On June 29, 1908, an amended petition was filed by Strange, making W.J. Moroney a party defendant in the suit. Moroney is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCampbell v. DurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Stroud v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Craig, Guardian v. HarlessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  5. East Texas Land & Improvement Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Carl v. SettegastTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Eckert v. WendelTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bush v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Ryan v. PlathWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Moore v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API