Legal Opinion

Slyter v. Clinton Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1930No. Docket No. 7073PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendant Clinton Construction Company of California, a corporation, from a judgment entered against it upon a verdict of a jury in the sum of $15,000.

Sol Slyter brought this action through his guardian, charging that he was severely injured by the falling of a scaffold, upon which he was working as a plasterer, and that said scaffold fell by reason of the negligence of the defendant and appellant corporation.

The facts necessary for a correct understanding of the questions involved on this appeal, and which are practically uncontradicted,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Neuber v. Royal Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Hard v. Hollywood Turf ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Leenders v. California Hawaiian Sugar Refining Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Counihan v. Lufstufka Bros. & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API